Texas Southern
79
Grand Canyon
103
| Team | H1 | H2 | T |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXSO | 37 | 42 | 79 |
| GCU | 48 | 55 | 103 |
AccuScore's simulation of the first half, priced against the books' 1st-half lines.
Leads at the half
| Book | GCU | EV | TXSO | EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings ↗ | -50000 | -0.8% | +4000 | -15.1% |
| BetMGM ↗ | -10000 | -0.4% | +3300 | -21.1% |
| Fanatics ↗ | -10000 | -0.4% | +3500 | -19.4% |
| Polymarket ↗ | -9122 | -0.3% | +4671 | -9.4% |
| Book | Line | Over | EV (O) | Under | EV (U) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings ↗ | 144.5 | -108 | -3.9% | -112 | -0.7% |
| FanDuel ↗ | 142.5 | -110 | +1.3% | -110 | -5.8% |
| BetMGM ↗ | 144.5 | -110 | -4.3% | -110 | -0.3% |
| Caesars ↗ | 144 | -110 | -2.8% | -110 | -1.6% |
| theScore Bet ↗ | 144.5 | -110 | -4.3% | -110 | -0.3% |
Share of bets (grey) and of money (green) on each side, per source. Sportsbook figures count tickets; Polymarket counts traders and Kalshi counts trades. Sources are shown separately, never averaged.
Get one of today's Gold picks delivered every morning — free.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
NCAAB
Final · TXSO 79–103 GCU ·
AccuScore's simulation makes Grand Canyon 98% to beat Texas Southern (2%). Final score: Texas Southern 79, Grand Canyon 103.
Projection updated
AccuScore's simulation makes Grand Canyon the more likely winner at 98%. The game finished Texas Southern 79, Grand Canyon 103.
AccuScore's simulation gives Grand Canyon a 98% chance of beating Texas Southern, against 2% for Texas Southern. It finished Grand Canyon 103, Texas Southern 79.
Texas Southern (0-1 so far) project to finish 12.2–16.8 and make the NCAA Tournament in 11% of AccuScore's simulated seasons.
Grand Canyon (1-0 so far) project to finish 20.2–9.8 and make the NCAA Tournament in 30% of AccuScore's simulated seasons.
| Team | Projected record | Conference title | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Texas Southern | 12.2–16.8 | 11% | 11% |
| Grand Canyon | 20.2–9.8 | 19% | 30% |
From AccuScore's daily simulation of the rest of the season. Every NCAAB team's projection →